Monday, April 19, 2010

Validating Prehistorical Infinite Souls


Last night I attempted to verify several things at one time via Michael Toth during the MT Live Chat (the transcript should be posted in its entirety in a week or so on MT website transcript page.) In other words, I was using questions through one channel to attempt to validate material from a different channel. Last November, I asked Michael through Troy Tolley about all of the previously mentioned, but never given by other channels, manifestations of pre-historical Infinite Souls and had received the following complete list of all Infinite Souls:

[MEntity] With approximate time frames - 
Ti'AT (female - 4,000,000 BCE), 
Khro'Te (male child - 2,000,000 BCE), 
Ker (female - 1,000,000 BCE), 
Sonad, Kin, Serep (brothers - 700,000 BCE), 
Tinet, TenTen, Tia (sisters - 500,000 BCE), 
Shia (female - 150,000 BCE), 
Kendre (female - 75,000 BCE), 
"Ra" (male - 6,000 BCE), 
"Krishna" (6,000 BCE) 
"Lilith" (female - 4,000 BCE), 
Lao Tzu (male - 500 BCE), 
Naturally, most of these will never be validated as such. They are lost in the mists of time. I was using the term prehistorical as meaning pre-written record. So, the next best thing is to ask a different channel for information on the topic. See if they validate, clarify, or reject the basic topic.

Geraldine] Hello, Michaels. I've previously asked about prehistorical Infinite Souls. Some were given that spanned back into millions of years. We've been told that the Infinite Soul manifests from an entire Cadre on the Causal. Yet, only one Energy Ring of 12 cadres has cycled off and several of these IS manifestations seem to predate the evolution of these cadres. Who or what was working to help evolving humans in these early years?
[Michael_Toth] Hello Geraldine.  We can confirm what fragmentary influence a cadre has on the manifestation of an Infinite Soul. In regard to there being one known energy ring to supply fodder for incarnation and evolution. It is here that the critical knowledge of what transpires in this known universe is little known or thought of. At present there a a very large number of sentient creatures of reason species living out their lives throughout your star system referred to as the Milky Way Galaxy. As agreements are made between fragments on the physical plane to share notes from a class in literature or to point out the directions of the nearest washroom there are and have been many and numerous ways that other energy rings, other elements of the Tao, that come together and engage in the process of evolution in myriad ways. There are more entities, cadres, and so on involved in the evolution that has begun on earth. The information involves other cadres and rings that participated in this experience begun some two or three million years ago that you are now a part of. We understand the desire to complete a history of things on that scale. Suffice it to say that the entities most responsible for bringing similar truths about life, and incarnation bore names that would not be  understandable by you in your languages today. These energies were not necessarily from the same line of fragmentation of the Tao that we were, but their experiences and the relativeness of their body types were similar enough that truth is truth.
[Geraldine] Thank you -- so even beginners have some help -- I like that :)
[Michael_Toth] The baton was passed, and as can often be the case in what must appear as chaos and chaotic there is still an orderliness. Time did not begin in regard to fragmentation of the Tao simply because this universe you are in began 14 billion years ago. The Tao is much older and so is evolution.
 One of the issues I'd had about validating Infinite Souls was resolved to my satisfaction. Plus, it expanded my awareness of just how big Tao is and that while we might view our existences through the very narrow filter of ego and *I*-consciousness, there is a whole lot more "out there" than we can imagine or that fits our science explorations at this time. Plus, it answered the question of "Who taught the first Energy Ring (and Michael)?"

1 comment:

  1. This piece from Michael Toth is in keeping with how I understand it from Michael, too, so that's cool!

    ReplyDelete