Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Validating Unusual Claims

One of the strangest stories to emerge from the recent East Coast Michael Students Gathering in WV was reported to me by two attendees. This type of thing is the heart and soul of why everyone needs to validate -- if it goes against everything else that Michael has said, it's likely simply not true and shouldn't be carried around like a trophy. One student is claiming that one of the well-known channels has said that their body is hosting a full cadence of 7 essences all in one incarnation AND that all 7 roles are represented.

I've heard of walk-ins, which are rare, one fragment exits and another enters and takes over the fully developed body. . .and THAT takes 7 years to adapt and adjust to as the new fragment has to try and decode memories locked in a brain. Even when all of the energy of one Cadre manifests into a body, the previous fragment walks-out, and the energy is so strong that it burns the body out within about a month.  I've heard of Cadences which might have several roles, but all 7? A cadence is just one row within a block of an entity. It tends to be 7 of the same role with different casting for each due to their column.

The need to be special rather than just unique is driven by the engines of ego, Maya, and false personality. If something sounds too good to be true and/or is at odds with the rest of the teachings, it needs to be questioned stringently. Of course, there is always the possibility that desire and delusion have taken over and it is up to others to apply validating practices before believing too quickly.

3 comments:

  1. Hello, Diane sent me a link here!

    If it's the same person, I was there a couple years ago when that person originally made those claims. As I remember the second hand story, Shepherd first said just one overleaf, but that person kept bugging Shepherd and insisting there was more than one and was willing to pay for more charts. Eventually Shepherd relented under the pressure, basically saying he'll just see what comes, and did a whole bunch more charts for that same person. This seemed to be taken as "proof" of the multiple essence idea by that person.

    However, by that same logic, every time someone has their chart channeled more than once then they must have multiple essences. [Though to be fair, Shepherd does say this is possible in his book. I think he referred to John the Baptist]

    There is a human tendency to just let things like that slide publicly, especially when someone gives the impression they would argue vociferously. But I have been amazed at just how much claims sometimes slide, especially around overleaves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I, too, am amazed that Michael students accept such things with a certain amount of bobble-headedness.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have all of the documents from the person claiming this, and I think he freely makes them available. I'll post my synopsis once I've read it all.

    This situation is a potential example of the need for specialness. And in the vein of your blog, this situation validates the pandering that a channel can stoop to in putting the pleasing of the client above actual channeling of Michael, especially if cash is involved.

    Red Flags all around.

    ReplyDelete